That's when New York State steps in with "matching funds." Localities send a report of how much money they saved, and the state sends them a cash reward.

Long Island's Nassau County announced last month that its villages had saved $1.6 million by combining services. As a reward, the villages will receive $960,000 of taxpayer money from the state -- erasing more than half of the savings.

In some instances, towns received matching funds that exceeded their reported savings. Onondaga County and the City of Syracuse announced they had saved $2.2 million by merging their Medicare plans in 2017. The state rewarded them with $5.7 million.

New York has awarded matching funds to over 100 applicants. There are 34 more awaiting potential funds.

One might argue that the program saves money in the long run. The matching funds are a one-time payment, while the local savings are permanent and can reduce property taxes.

However, it's unclear why the matching funds are necessary at all. Tiny villages should not have separate local services in the first place. If the services can be combined, saving money should be its own incentive; no matching funds needed.

Search all federal, state and local government salaries and vendor spending with the AI search bot, Benjamin, at OpenTheBooks.com.

Summary: Paying local governments to spend less money is absurd both on paper and in practice.

The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com